Editor’s Note: This is part of a shared blog series between Trifecta General Counsel and Moxe, chronicling the journey to research and understand the interactions between state-based privacy laws and HIPAA. See the first in the series here.
Trifecta General Counsel provides next-gen legal services for tech-focused companies. Moxe facilitates bidirectional sharing of medical records between health plans and health systems, enabling collaboration and the sharing of key patient insights.
We’re diving in to state #3 in our comparison of state-based data privacy laws and HIPAA. As a refresher, HIPAA applies at the federal level to the following events in the life cycle of protected health information:
How extensive are the California laws?
Pretty extensive.
As a state with almost 40 million residents, adhering to data privacy regulations for California is a big deal. Not only does California specify health data laws that apply to each of the HIPAA, they will be going big soon. As of 1/1/2020, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) takes effect and will impact a wide swath of personal data outside of the PHI governed by HIPAA. Take a look here for a deeper dive into the CCPA. Meanwhile, let’s walk through the California-specific regulations that do affect PHI.
Similar to Virginia, California law specifically regulates the use and disclosure of medical information by Health Care Providers:
California regulations then go on to say that the recipient of information may further disclose the information they receive without patient authorization, if the disclosure is for one of the specific purposes listed in the regulations. Those recipients are also required to follow those requirements. Selling patient information or disclosing it for marketing purposes is never allowed without the consent of the patient.
Unlike Ohio and Virginia, several sections of California Law include requirements for the processing and storage of medical information.
Any business that owns, licenses, or maintains personal information about CA residents must implement and maintain reasonable and appropriate security procedures and practices, including creation, storage, use, and destruction of medical information. Compliance with a law that provides greater protection to personal information, such as HIPAA, would apply to this scenario.
California laws have a lot to say about Breach notifications for the loss of personal information about California residents by an entity operating in California. To start, the statutes dictate that notice must be provided without unreasonable delay, and they provide a form to follow for any Breach notification. It includes data such as:
At a large scale (more than $250,000 or more than 500,000 people), substitute notice steps may be taken, and they must include:
At both Trifecta and Moxe, we are passionate about HIPAA. Even if HIPAA isn’t in your daily vocabulary, it can be a great excuse to learn more about laws designed to protect your PHI. Let us know if you have questions about HIPAA or about how Moxe protects your data. Stay tuned for our next state-based analysis of data privacy, security, and breach management!